I think it is fitting for my first post to cite Sarah, the wife of Abraham. She was a resilient beauty who has been battered around by many people, mostly other women.
For most of my Christian walk, I had mixed feelings about Sarah. Much of the conflict was due to the way Sarah is maligned by those who are unfriendly to the whole concept of submission. Biblical submission, that is.
Along with my mixed feelings about Sarah, I had similar ambivalences about Peter’s teaching to women: “Likewise, wives, be subject to your own husbands, so that even if some do not obey the word, they may be won without a word by the conduct of their wives- when they see your respectful and pure conduct.” I Peter 3:1
Many of the folks who do not like wifely submission in marriage; feminists, and liberal leaning Christians, revise her character and role to that of Abraham’s pawn. It gives one a jolt to realize that revisionism is not just a feature of public school social studies classes. Revising heroes of the faith is rampant in evangelical circles and churches today.
It has become part of the dumbing down of the evangelical believer. I think this goes a long way in explaining why Bible reading and believing Christian women can be conflicted when the Apostle Peter says, “Let your adorning be the hidden person of the heart with the imperishable beauty of a gentle and quiet spirit, which in God’s sight is very precious. For this is how the holy women of the past used to adorn themselves, by submitting to their husbands, as Sarah obeyed Abraham, calling him lord. And you are her daughters if you do good and do not fear anything that is frightening." 1 Peter 3:1-7
It is very clear from Scripture that the Apostles Paul and Peter believed in the principle of complementary roles in marriage. The man is to be the primary spiritual leader in the home and the church. Marriage itself is a metaphor for the church. Wives are to be submissive to their husbands, and prohibited from leading over men in the church and home. ( I Timothy 2:1-15) Men, whether they feel up to the challenge or not, are called to be the spiritual leaders.
The Apostle Paul said: “As in all the churches of the saints, the women should keep silent in the churches. For they are not permitted to speak.” [I Corinthians 14:33&34] I suspect Paul's admonition was to the men, who were strangely enough, prone to abandoning leadership to women. Our culture bears many similarities to that of ancient Rome.
To me, Paul’s words suggest that things could be very different, but are not and should not be for very good reasons. It is so important not to abandon foundation!
What do you as a woman think about the Apostle Paul, great missionary, theologian, pioneer of the early Christian church saying this? What I think many in the debate about gender roles overlook, is that Paul was simply explaining how leadership is decided and why. His communities of believers had a vision for godly masculine leadership, and needed occasional briefings on the foundational reasons. They, like us, knew that women are very capable of multiple roles. They, like us, included women as full participants in the Body of Christ. And they, like us, knew that there was an order and wisdom to things (foundation) that might sometimes become overlooked or taken for granted in a zeal for spiritual gifts, or power, or equality. Those Corinthian believers were told by Paul, Creation, and Scripture that the men remain the primary leaders of the church of Christ.
Yet, this mandate is offensive to people who do not agree with Paul, or Peter, or Scripture as a whole. There are entire methods of interpretation designed to arrive at conclusions other than what Biblical authors intended. Many seminaries and scholars have revisited the liberalism of old that influences or even motivates much of the “Evangelical Feminism”, or Egalitarianism. Therefore, it follows that less than well-informed believers, listening to pop-oriented sermons, become less biblically discerning. If we like and respect a pastor, author, or speaker, we adopt their view and interpretation of the holy men and women of the past. One may recall the jist of the story, the names of the characters, and some conventional application of it. However, the bottom line and fuller meaning of the text of Scripture will often be lost to a man-centered interpretation. Sadly, the compelling work of God in the lives of Bible heroes and their passion for God’s glory gets lost as well. But the revision of their lives continues to develop.
It has been said that the best commentary on the Bible is the Bible. This is most strikingly true in the case of Hebrews 11, known as the hall of faith. The unknown human author of Hebrews commends faith by outlining the history of God’s faithfulness to his people since the time of Abel. Each of the 15 people named, two are women, are cited as examples of faithfulness. Yet some of those examples are a bit unsettling when viewed through a revised, man-centered lens. These witnesses of the faith were not politically correct. Some were baffling or infuriating to our sensibilities. One was a living, breathing reality show! Nevertheless, God used them all to point to his grace and his chosen people’s perseverance.
I want to know the men and women of Scripture as God’s Word portrays them to us, showing us his work in their lives. In order to be challenged and inspired, we should be diligent in our efforts to understand them, their lives and contexts, and the issues their lives raise. We should definitely want to know what God says first hand to begin to apprehend his purposes.
In much the same way I have approached holy women of the past in my first book, I would like to study the lives of the Hebrews 11 saints. I invite you to join me here! There are fifteen named: Abel, Enoch, Noah, Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Sarah, Moses, Rahab, Gideon, Barak, Samson, Jephthah, David, Samuel and the prophets. In the following posts we will go back to Genesis 4 to review the text that tells of the first martyr: Abel.